Real or fake?

Users viewing topic: & 3 Guests

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

TravisFandango		...	20-12-2011 @ 04:03
Member 1093, 5446 posts SQ 160, BP 105, DL 225 490.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq	Wayne_Cowdrey said:http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/mjm/whatrtha.asp I should be in bed, but... 'Bigfoot advocates as well as informed skeptics generally do not believe a hoax is responsible for this phenomenon,' This isn't true. 'Probably the most crucial question concerns whether Gigantos walked upright. There is more than one school of thought among anthrolopogists regarding this issue. Some physical anthropologists interpret the scant fossilized remains to indicate an upright walking ape' Cherry picked evidence, as seemingly only the Bigfoot advocates believe this to be the case. It appears that most anthropologists believe the creature walked on all fours. Anyway, it's fascinating stuff! I hope the Owl alows me more Bigfoot research time when I visit tomorrow.

IrishMarc		...	20-12-2011 @ 04:11
no really Irish Member 1196, 5908 posts SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320 862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq	Post Edited: 20.12.2011 @ 04:11 AM by IrishMarc Wayne_Cowdrey said:http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/mjm/whatrtha.asp [Img]s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/entries/icons/original/000/006/434/tumblr_lkhs6sGE761qf1x6h.jpg

deleted2_20210523		...	20-12-2011 @ 04:48
Member 2606, 11453 posts SQ 170, BP 117.5, DL 215 502.5 kgs @ 91.6kgs UnEq	deleted

drew		...	20-12-2011 @ 05:48
I thought Joplin choked on a sandwich? Member 616, 8404 posts SQ 180, BP 130, DL 220 530.0 kgs @ 78.8kgs UnEq	I said:your an idiot t**t belated appologies

TravisFandango		...	20-12-2011 @ 12:23
Member 1093, 5446 posts SQ 160, BP 105, DL 225 490.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq	kirkynick said: Never thought i would see anthropology being mentioned on this forum. I have two degrees in anthropology (although only a little part of the first one concerned physical and biological anthropology). Excellent! Would you happen to know what the population size would be in order to sustain a group* of Gigantopithecus? * I have no idea what the collective noun for a group of Gigantopithecus is.

PAGAN		...	20-12-2011 @ 12:37
I took about £4 out of Sooty's bottom Member 685, 8719 posts SQ 225, BP 150, DL 290 665.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq	I read the thread title and thought it would be about breasts. I am dissapoint.

deleted2_20210523		...	20-12-2011 @ 13:07
Member 2606, 11453 posts SQ 170, BP 117.5, DL 215 502.5 kgs @ 91.6kgs UnEq	deleted


TravisFandango		...	20-12-2011 @ 13:15
Member 1093, 5446 posts SQ 160, BP 105, DL 225 490.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq	PAGAN said:I read the thread title and thought it would be about breasts. I am dissapoint. I really don't know this, but I imagine a female Bigfoot's breasts to be hairy, large and pendulous... Somewhat like mine.

TravisFandango		...	20-12-2011 @ 13:25
Member 1093, 5446 posts SQ 160, BP 105, DL 225 490.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq	kirkynick said: To be honest, no! I haven't read the thread from the beginning, but i presume it is about arguments for and against there being a bigfoot. It would be great if there is a bigfoot out there, but i don't think there it. I have seen no legitimate evidence to even slightly prove that there is. But, i would love to be proved wrong. The thread started off being about the authenticity of the footage below. I resurrected it after a discussion with Mr Wayne about Bigfoot. My take on the subject is pretty much the same as yours. PS. Mr Wayne that website is nuts!! I'm reading the bit about Bigfoot deer murderers at the moment.

Villa_Ste		...	20-12-2011 @ 16:49
stingy with his letters Member 496, 668 posts SQ 210, BP 190, DL 230 630.0 kgs @ 111kgs UnEq	most disappointing thread ever, clicked on this expecting to see a range of boobs from which i could guess real or fake. instead i find videos of my ex girlfriend

Wayne_Cowdrey		...	24-12-2011 @ 15:02
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22050 posts	Bigfoot programme just starting on National Geographic +1

Wayne_Cowdrey		...	24-12-2011 @ 16:04
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22050 posts	I said: Bigfoot programme just starting on National Geographic +1 Interesting analysis of the Patterson footage and interesting about the hair samples that don't match any known animal

Wayne_Cowdrey		...	24-12-2011 @ 22:54
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22050 posts	drew said: belated appologies No worries! You're right! I am a harmless idiot though

TravisFandango		...	26-12-2011 @ 12:36
Member 1093, 5446 posts SQ 160, BP 105, DL 225 490.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq	Post Edited: 26.12.2011 @ 12:47 PM by TravisFandango Wayne_Cowdrey said: Interesting analysis of the Patterson footage and interesting about the hair samples that don't match any known animal I'm a bit curious as to why they didn't go into more detail about these mystery hairs that they found though??? Surely that would have been more worthy of explanation / investigation?? Oh... This is why they didn't go into it in any detail... It is important to understand the science behind hair analyses: An outcome of "unknown" or "inconclusive" does not necessarily mean the sample came from a Bigfoot. All it means is that the sample did not match whichever other samples it was compared to. For that reason, a wig or carpet fiber or even hair from an animal foreign to the region (such as a kangaroo or camel) claimed to be from a Bigfoot will likely be reported as "unknown." It also highlights a basic methodological problem that plagues all Bigfoot research: The lack of a standard measure. We know what a bear track looks like; if we find a track that we suspect was left by a bear, we can compare it to one we know was left by a bear. But there are no undisputed Bigfoot specimens by which to compare new evidence.

Wayne_Cowdrey		...	27-12-2011 @ 00:33
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22050 posts	Yes, they said there's no Bigfoot specimen for comparison.... but these hairs were "primate like"

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

You are here: Home → Forum → General Bullshit → Real or fake?

RETURN TO TOP