An old, fat fool starts a log. Hope no-one minds
Users viewing topic: & 3 Guests
12345678910 ... 153115321533 ... 15371538153915401541154215431544154515461547
| Fatpete |  | ... | 08-03-2024 @ 21:01 |
 Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Friday, 8th March, start 15:15 Barbell bent row 20 x 10 20 x 10 30 x 10 40 x 10 50 x 10 60 x 10 70 x 10 Deadlift 30 x 3 40 x 3 50 x 3 60 x 3 70 x 3 80 x 3 90 x 3 100 x 3 110 x 3 120 x 3 130 x 3 140 x 3 140 x 3 Knees were much less creaky than last week but still creaked a little. Bodyweight - 127.3 kilos, more or less bang on twenty stone | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 08-03-2024 @ 21:10 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Wigan said: I have no idea why I wrote it that way. I was told by someone I used to work with, who had previously worked as a proof reader, that you should write numbers 0-9 as words but 10 and above as numbers. I don't know how true that is or if she just made it up Whenever I have researched this on the interweb it has more or less confirmed what your friend said. It depends on the publishing house but the more common rule being as 0-9 and then ten and up, the alternative, and less common being 0-19 and then twenty and up. Personally in the gulag I called school we were told that we should write as words any number that could be written as two or fewer words, so one, two, three, forty nine, one hundred, two thousand, twenty million etc. However if more than two words were needed eg one thousand, nine hundred and sixteen then 1916 was the way to go. It would also be true to say that I have never met anyone else who has been taught this method and that there were acceptable exceptions (as alluded to by Wayne) but these would be to numerous to mention, but we all know they are out there. | ||
| Wayne_Cowdrey |  | ... | 09-03-2024 @ 00:40 |
 Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22054 posts | A quick 3. | ||
| Bod | | ... | 09-03-2024 @ 00:45 |
 Member 174, 1235 posts | A slightly laborious yet very satisfying four. The third was tactical and very pleasing as it took a while to come up with it. The opener yielded my least favourite outcome when the letters fall in the manner that they did. YXXXY XXXXX GXXGG | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 09-03-2024 @ 08:28 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | A quick and easy four XXXXY XXXXX GYXXX That doesn't like much to go on, but a stern look with a furrowed brow produced a "Ah, of course" which was correct | ||
| Rick | | ... | 09-03-2024 @ 13:45 |
 I am a bench-only guy Member 3, 10035 posts SQ 185, BP 175, DL 235595.0 kgs @ 140kgs UnEq Administrator | At the very first contest I attended, having never previously met any of the NWPL or Adlington regulars: - Pete smuggled a mobile 'phone into a prison - Turner sank a squat to the bottom, forgot what to do next, and rolled over on to his back frozen into position (bar and all) - Bryn walked a squat out and stood there shaking for thirty seconds until the side ref beckoned him back in, the centre ref having fallen asleep. It's really a surprise I ever got involved. YXXXY XYXXX GGGGG lucky boy | ||
| Wayne_Cowdrey | | ... | 10-03-2024 @ 08:33 |
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22054 posts | 5 | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 10-03-2024 @ 08:58 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | A fairly swift four XYXXX YXXXX XGXYX Minimal scribbling, my first idea was fruitless, my second fruitful | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 10-03-2024 @ 09:00 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Rick said:At the very first contest I attended, having never previously met any of the NWPL or Adlington regulars: - Pete smuggled a mobile 'phone into a prison I remember it well, and I still can't believe I did not see the biggest "NO MOBILE PHONES" notice I have ever seen (although only on the way out), but I didn't. Honest officer, I just didn't. | ||
| Wayne_Cowdrey | | ... | 11-03-2024 @ 07:29 |
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22054 posts | 2  | ||
| Wigan | | ... | 11-03-2024 @ 08:27 |
 a cynical old scrote Member 68, 6843 posts SQ 255, BP 132.5, DL 250637.5 kgs @ 110kgs UnEq | Wayne_Cowdrey said:2 Nice, that was in my opinion, a good word to get in two!! Four for me today, quite satisfying none the less YXXXX XXXYX GXYXY | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 11-03-2024 @ 08:46 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | A horrible four XXXXY YXXXX XXYYX Four letters, none in the right place, and it took a long while to get a handle on this. Actually I sat and stared for a good few minutes and got nowhere, then I wandered into the kitchen to make tea and while filling the kettle the penny dropped. Friday will be wordle number 1,000. I wonder if it will be just another day or if they have something cunning planned ? | ||
| Fatpete | | ... | 11-03-2024 @ 18:48 |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17888 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Mondaay, 11th March, start 15:00 Close grip bench 20 x 5 20 x 5 20 x 5 30 x 5 40 x 5 50 x 5 60 x 3 65 x 3 70 x 3 75 x 3 77 x 3 80 x 3 82 x 3 85 x 3 Inched it up a little this week and woud wouldn't have inched any further. Good call by me. | ||
| Bod | | ... | 11-03-2024 @ 23:23 |
Member 174, 1235 posts | Three for me. Usual openers and a slightly speculative third, but not a gamble in terms of potential overall failure. XXXXY YXXXX | ||
| Wayne_Cowdrey | | ... | 12-03-2024 @ 00:08 |
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22054 posts | 4 | ||
12345678910 ... 153115321533 ... 15371538153915401541154215431544154515461547